🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.